Royal Baby - Printable Version
+- Mpreg Central (https://mpregcentral.net/forums)
+-- Forum: General (https://mpregcentral.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://mpregcentral.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Royal Baby (/showthread.php?tid=2066)
+- Mpreg Central (https://mpregcentral.net/forums)
+-- Forum: General (https://mpregcentral.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://mpregcentral.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Royal Baby (/showthread.php?tid=2066)
Royal Baby - xHappyBumpx - 07-23-2013
At 16:24 yesterday the new prince was born. Kate and William thrilled and overjoyed to finally have him here and mummy and baby both healthy and happy. Still no name yet.
RE: Royal Baby - Goddess - 07-24-2013
Im dying for the name! Lol
RE: Royal Baby - xHappyBumpx - 07-24-2013
Well we're thinking the following would be good choices. George, Alexander, Phillip, Henry, Edward, James, William jr.
RE: Royal Baby - TheKicking - 07-24-2013
I dunno... I'm kinda hoping they don't give the baby a name that has already been held by at least 3 other European monarchs. He's the first in a new, more progressive monarchial line. I'd like to see him have a name that's still traditional, but makes him stand apart from his forefathers.
Alexander wouldn't be so bad though. It's a good, strong name.
RE: Royal Baby - star478 - 07-24-2013
It is official (if you haven't heard yet). The baby's name is George Alexander Louis.
Would have liked to have a different name but oh well. I'm not the father.
RE: Royal Baby - xHappyBumpx - 07-25-2013
It's not so much you're not the Father as even William has a stupidly unfair obligation to stick to 'appropriate' names. - I say screw that! He's a baby, a little person, not a law or piece of legislation!