04-24-2012, 02:03 AM
(04-23-2012, 04:36 AM)LuvTheBump Wrote: So it's not redundant in that we're insisting that only parts of a fetish site are not work place appropriate, but rather it's us extending a courtesy to the users who prefer mild material.
Then what's the difficulty with having the under-18 warning like with the previous site? Going by what both you and The Kicking are saying, doesn't that really fall under the same overall umbrella? While it's not extreme or R-rated, it would certainly seem (well, to me, anyway) that it would perhaps be best to say that such warnings are there for people who do prefer more mild material, which, among other things, sometimes includes having the pregnant individual (whether male or female) be at least 18 years of age.
And yes, I realize that part of this discussion (as well as Elvira's question on clarifying NSFW) is just trying to figure out how to say that in such a way that people don't have to read several pages' worth of rules and examples before they feel comfortable with submitting anything. Perhaps something along the lines of a statement like the following would help:
"While we recognize that there are many in the Mpreg Community who like a wide variety of descriptions in both stories and art, there are also those who are not comfortable with reading certain descriptions. As such, we do ask that you include in the subject line a label of 'Under-18' for stories involving pregnant characters under the age of 18, and 'NSFW' for stories/art/RP including..." (listing the things The Kicking specified in her post in response to Elvira's "Clarify NSFW" post).
Thoughts?