07-23-2014, 07:27 PM
"Maybe you should trust both. Maybe you should trust neither. Maybe you should trust yourself. Maybe you can't be trusted. Both sides have their points, I must say."
"But here's an interesting question. If you have something potentially dangerous, should you cage it for what it MIGHT do? On the one hand, you have something dangerous locked away where it can do no harm, but doing this makes it angry and hateful. It will want to escape and have revenge. And it inevitably will. Only a fool believes something dangerous can be contained forever."
"If you leave it free, there's a chance it will decide to be evil and destructive, but it has no reason to be angry or bitter. It can live in this world and learn of its people. It can do great things when it learns what it can truly do. But of course, there's always that chance. That chance your leniency will turn out to be a great mistake."
"Should something be caged for what it MIGHT do?"
"But here's an interesting question. If you have something potentially dangerous, should you cage it for what it MIGHT do? On the one hand, you have something dangerous locked away where it can do no harm, but doing this makes it angry and hateful. It will want to escape and have revenge. And it inevitably will. Only a fool believes something dangerous can be contained forever."
"If you leave it free, there's a chance it will decide to be evil and destructive, but it has no reason to be angry or bitter. It can live in this world and learn of its people. It can do great things when it learns what it can truly do. But of course, there's always that chance. That chance your leniency will turn out to be a great mistake."
"Should something be caged for what it MIGHT do?"
I'm just here for a laugh
